Skip to content
Ground Truth
Articles Ratings Method About Subscribe

Analysis

Original findings, recomputed and cross-checked.

Each analysis assembles something no single study or press release contains — a cross-study table, a recomputed rate — from the primary sources. To guard against a coding error rather than a typo, every finding is built independently by two different AI models and reconciled against the source, with the disagreements published. The data lives in the page for you to check and reuse.

  • 5 Jul 2026 Analysis Benchmarks

    The scoreboard that can’t be drawn: what 15 “AI-beats-clinician” health studies actually measured

    Fifteen studies say AI matches or beats clinicians in global health. Grouped honestly, “beats doctors” fractures into five different claims — no fair test, a win over the weakest human, a genuine tie with experts, an outright loss, and AI merely assisting a clinician — on a dozen scales that don’t compare, and almost never measured on a patient. An original, cross-checked dataset.

The newsletter

Get the hidden conditions, not the hype.

Every few weeks: one big health-AI claim, traced to its primary source, with the part the headline left out put back in red. That’s the whole email — one-click unsubscribe, no tracking pixels.

What we store when you subscribe, and why →


Ground Truth

An independent publication scrutinizing AI claims in health. We trace every claim to its primary source and correct our own errors in public.

Read

  • All articles
  • Ratings registry
  • The method
  • RSS feed

Accountability

  • Editorial standard
  • What we review
  • Independence
  • Corrections log
  • Privacy
  • Submit a tip or correction

© 2026 Ground Truth